60.00% - Concentrating population in cities is more efficient per capita in almost every measurable way — smart growth policy should make cities more appealing to live in.
40.00% - A city of a million people occupies far less land than the same population dispersed in suburbs — concentrated settlement is our best conservation strategy.
Low-density sprawl consumes excess land per household and should be pulled back toward existing urban areas.
60.00% - If you want to protect forests and open land, live in a city — every urban resident is a person not clearing trees for a cul-de-sac.
50.00% - Low-density sprawl consumes excess land per household and should be pulled back toward existing urban areas.
50.00% - Sprawl consumes land, requires car dependency, and is expensive to serve; growth should be concentrated in existing urban areas.
0.00% - Housing sprawl should be avoided pulled back in where possible.
50.00% - Quebec