52.50% - Public goods should be available to all.
25.00% - A means test helps avoid criticism that a policy is unneeded.
22.50% - The standard(s) used for a means test will always be somewhat crude and arbitrary.
Means testing breeds opposition between included and excluded groups.
40.00% - Means-testing focuses limited government resources on people who actually need them — it's not about creating in-groups; it's about not writing checks to people who don't.
35.00% - A means test helps avoid criticism that a policy is unneeded.
25.00% - Means tested eligibility will always result in some people deemed eligible that are less deserving than some deemed ineligible.
67.19% - Public goods should be available to all.
17.19% - A means test helps avoid criticism that a policy is unneeded.
15.63% - A means test requires creating an in-group and out-group.
33.33% - Means testing needlessly creates opposing interest groups
33.33% - Means testing breeds opposition between included and excluded groups.
33.33% - Means testing breeds opposition between the included and the excluded.
50.00% - Greenland crisis
