55.71% - GMOs regulatory framework is not robust enough to respond to unexpected threats.
25.07% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field — just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
15.50% - GMO technology can be regulated with approved varieties and monitoring requirements — a blanket ban is a failure to think the problem through.
2.79% - The current regulatory framework for GMOs is insufficient.
0.93% - GMO regulation must be fixed to support broader societal goals.
A single application shouldn’t impugn an entire field of technology.
35.00% - You shouldn’t eat GMOs because they are bad for you.
25.00% - GMO’s contain toxins.
20.00% - Developing a GMO crop variety takes years of lab work and field trials before a single commercial acre gets planted — that research requires serious capital investment.
15.00% - GMOs exhibit a significant enough danger that they should be banned.
5.00% - GMO crop development costs hundreds of millions of dollars — family farms don't run biotech labs; that's why it's Monsanto, Bayer, and Syngenta doing the research. Not a scandal, just scale.
52.17% - GMO technology can be regulated with approved varieties and monitoring requirements — a blanket ban is a failure to think the problem through.
47.83% - Farmers have planted GMO soybeans since 1996 and grocery stores have carried GMO products for decades without incident — let farmers and markets keep making these calls.
20.00% - A single troubling application of a technology does not condemn the entire field.
20.00% - A single application shouldn’t impugn an entire field of technology.
20.00% - A single problematic application does not invalidate an entire field of technology.
20.00% - One bad application of a technology does not condemn every application of it.
20.00% - A single problematic application of a technology does not condemn the whole field.
50.00% - Chipotle Mexican Grill
