30.00% - Sanctioned camps with services or designated shelter villages beat improvised camps with no coordination — you can address homelessness more humanely with a plan.
27.50% - Most of Seattle's homeless population has local roots — treating the crisis as a magnet problem misidentifies both the cause and the solution.
22.50% - Telling Seattle's unhoused to move somewhere cheaper ignores the family ties that bind people to a place — that's not a policy, it's indifference.
20.00% - Seattle hasn't run out of space — the constraint is zoning, not land; single-family zones represent enormous potential for gentle density.
Vacant lots should be used for micro-shelter villages to house the unhoused.
55.00% - Most of Seattle's homeless population has local roots — treating the crisis as a magnet problem misidentifies both the cause and the solution.
45.00% - If reallocation has been genuinely exhausted and the homelessness crisis persists, additional revenue is warranted — it costs more untreated than treated.
50.00% - Vacant lots should be used for micro-shelter villages to house the unhoused.
50.00% - Micro-shelter villages on vacant urban lots offer faster dignified housing than waiting for permanent units.
0.00% - Vacant lots should be designated tiny home villages to house the unhoused.
50.00% - Kansas City, Missouri
