Agitate

Because

No Results - Accept the argument to be the first to endorse

Argument 24

50 .0% of 26 users accept

There is a danger for GMOs leading to species that serve the goals of special interests but diminish the wider needs of humanity.

Biodiversity - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

Rebuttal

27.69% - Once a technology is understood, the next step is deploying it â€” that's how every agricultural advance from hybrid seed to tractors got adopted.
23.08% - No test can eliminate every theoretical unknown â€” at some point you accept the evidence and let farmers use the technology.
18.46% - Treating GMO crops as permanently under suspicion â€” provisional approvals, emergency-use restrictions, mandatory labeling â€” means they never get a fair shot to prove themselves.
13.85% - Farmers have planted GMO soybeans since 1996 and grocery stores have carried GMO products for decades without incident â€” let farmers and markets keep making these calls.
9.23% - Running safety tests before scaling a new technology is responsible development â€” not grounds for keeping it locked in a lab indefinitely.
2.83% - A troubling application of GMO technology doesn't indict the entire field â€” just like one bad drug doesn't end all pharmaceutical research.
2.63% - Thirty years of GMO data shows no cancer spikes, no ecosystem destruction, no poisoned aquifers â€” apply the standard honestly, and GMO crops pass.
2.23% - Thirty years of commercial GMO crops, and not one cancer spike, not one ecological catastrophe â€” the danger argument is dead.

Therefore

Find

Last Visited

Recent Assertions

Go to ID