AGITATE

• Abortion
• Black Lives Matter
• Cancel Culture
• Capitalism as a System
• Catholic Church Abuse
• Christianity & Faith
• Climate Change
• Conspiracy Theories
• COVID Mandates
• Cryptocurrency
• Environmental Policy
• Gender & Trans Rights
• GMO Crops
• Government & Free Markets
• Gun Rights
• Housing & Homelessness
• Immigration Policy
• Informal Debates
• Israel & Palestine
• Labor & Unions
• Media & Social Media
• Policing in America
• Pop Culture
• Public Health
• Race & Racism
• Republican Politics & Trump
• Sports & Athletics
• The Supreme Court
• Voting Rights
• War & Military
• Wealth & Taxation

• In Agitate parlance, an “argument” is a point being made and also a point in a system (a node or vertex) representing the dialogue being mapped. It exists independent of a specific phrasing so it may more precisely be identified by the way in which it connects to other arguments.
• Inherent racial bias has far reaching effects.
• Agitate aims to make a discernible map of the discourse.
• The Agitate platform resists arguments being made out of convenience - it should be hard (ultimately not allowed) to accept an argument in service to one line of reasoning but reject to strengthen another.
• Agitate is a good thing.
• Agitate has tremendous disruptive power.
• This is my first visit to Agitate
• Police officers deserve the support of the communities they serve.
• Agitate encourages convergence among many different voices.
• Government takeover of services consistently produces rising costs and declining quality.
• Agitate has major feature gaps to fill.
• Agitate could potentially be a really bad thing.
• Agitate resolves the major problems with polling as a measure of public opinion.
• On Agitate, users must accept or reject an argument independent of the other arguments they connecting it to.
• Arguments on Agitate should not be duplicated.
• Police departments must be defunded and reimagined from the ground up.
• American policing requires substantive reform across multiple dimensions.
• The degree of wealth inequality in America is beyond acceptable.
• It is more advantageous to use a pre-existing argument on Agitate that has existing engagement.
• Donate time, money and advice to Agitate.

• When technology is understood it can be incorporated into life
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Testing what we only know now won’t protect us from unknowns.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Sales of GMO should be unregulated.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• How can something be limited and still ever have a chance to be incorporated and trusted fully?
  13 accept · 13 reject
• There must be a line drawn where we allow some risk from unknowns?
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Research into GMOs is limited to a select few with significant funds.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Corporations demand sufficient return on their investment.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• GMOs can be used to protect intellectual property
  13 accept · 13 reject
• There is a danger for GMOs leading to species that serve the goals of special interests but diminish the wider needs of humanity.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Even if there are more benign or benifical applications, a single dangerous application can justify treaties to limit technology to select government agents i.e. nuclear tech
  13 accept · 13 reject
• You shouldn’t eat GMOs
  13 accept · 13 reject
• "Termination seeds" should be banned.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Intellectual property laws need reform.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• The current regulatory framework for GMOs is insufficient.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• GMOs regulatory framework is not robust enough to respond to unexpected threats.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• GMO regulation must be fixed to support broader societal goals.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• GMO research needs more government support to ensure innovation benefits society
  13 accept · 13 reject
• GMO can protect crops vulnerable to climate change.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• Allow GMOs for emergency response only.
  13 accept · 13 reject
• The history curriculum taught in American schools should be examined for its role in normalizing white supremacy.
  7 accept · 7 reject

Go